SaaS
Platform vs custom build review
Compared a no-code platform, an off-the-shelf SaaS, and a custom build for a regulated workflow. Recommendation saved a 9-month rebuild and a vendor lock-in trap.
- Build vs buy
- Regulated workflow
- Lock-in avoided
Systems & Automation
Architecture review, platform decisions, and risk assessment so you spend the next year building the right thing instead of quietly rebuilding the wrong one.
What this solves
The most expensive software mistakes are usually made in the first month — before a single line of code is written.
Picking a stack or vendor that can't follow you into year two.
Decisions made for v1 silently capping v3.
Critical third-party systems treated as 'we'll figure it out later' until it's too late.
Contracts and architectures that make leaving impossibly expensive.
Engineering, product, and leadership stuck on technical choices with no neutral voice in the room.
Old code with no docs, no tests, and a list of people who don't work there anymore.
What we cover
Independent technical review for the decisions and codebases where being wrong is expensive.
01
Current state, scaling limits, failure modes, and a remediation roadmap.
02
Stack, framework, and vendor decisions based on requirements — not preferences.
03
Build vs buy vs partner analysis for SaaS, internal platforms, and third-party services.
04
Phased plans that align engineering work with business priorities and capacity.
05
Load and stress reviews, bottleneck identification, and remediation plans.
06
Surface-level assessment of authn, authz, data handling, and dependency posture.
07
Practical strangler-fig and migration plans for aging systems — without rewriting the world.
08
Estimation, team shape, and delivery cadence advice for upcoming engagements.
09
Technical reviews for investors, acquirers, and board conversations.
What we deliver
An honest second opinion — documented, defensible, and tied to outcomes.
How we work
Understand the decision being made, the stakeholders involved, and the timeline driving it.
Read code, review architecture, interview engineering, product, and leadership, and inspect the data.
Compare options against requirements, constraints, and total cost — not just headline features.
A documented recommendation with trade-offs, risks, and clear next steps.
Walk leadership and engineering through the recommendation together so disagreement surfaces in the room, not after.
Ongoing technical advisory through implementation, with check-ins as decisions land.
Project examples
Anonymous examples of the types of projects this work supports.
SaaS
Compared a no-code platform, an off-the-shelf SaaS, and a custom build for a regulated workflow. Recommendation saved a 9-month rebuild and a vendor lock-in trap.
B2B platform
Pre-fundraise technical review covering scaling, security, and team shape. Output used directly in diligence conversations.
Connected services
Services that naturally strengthen this work.
FAQ
Short, honest answers. If you have something more specific, just ask.
Contact
Tell us the decision you're sitting on — vendor, stack, rebuild, hire. We'll tell you honestly whether it's worth a focused review.